Subject: Re: Fwd: A VIEW FROM THE INSIDE OF A BOMBING

CHRISTIANITY is NATO's TARGET
-----------------------------

http://www.beograd.com/kosovodossier

FIRST a mini rant, then KOSOVODOSSIER, an excellent set of
links and today's excerpt on CHRISTIANITY AS A TARGET.

NOTE: CIA [means British Intelligence and Mossad] has been
in KOSOVO for over 3 YEARS before this all came down.

YUGOSLAVIA is a CHRISTIAN NATION trying to repel ISLAMIC MARXIST
HEROIN/HASH HAWKING INSURGENTS.  NATO is protecting BRITISH and
AMERICAN [both CANAANITE-MASONIC OCCUPIED GOVERNMENTS] Drug and
Global Hegemony via ISLAMIC FOOT SOLDIERS, no different than in
AFGANISTAN, KASHMIR, PAKISTAN, LEBANON, and similar to VIETNAM,
CAMBODIA, CHINA [opium wars], etc etc. Drug trade [and before
that SLAVE TRADE] has always been used to extert and extend
power, no different today.  Drugs/weapons are useful because one
does not have to account for the funds since they are supposed
to be "illegal" or black ops.  They are also useful because
those who deal them can be later DITCHED and dispensed with
after their usefulness is over. Due to them being outlaws no one
will believe a word they say, and if they do talk they can be
thrown into jail. So it is beneficial to create illegal commerce
and turn it on and off at will, via selective prosecution and
"control" of borders and people via selective customs
enforcement, military "cargo" and creation of refugees, and
forced emigrations via phony wars and wield TREMENDOUS POWER
thereby.  Tool Numero Uno. Russia is JUST AS duped as Europe and
the USA are, most of each country's people believe this is all
for real, when in actuality, each blok [usa, europe, russia,
china etc] is really controlled to greater or lesser extents by
the SAME CANAANITE MASONIC ORDER. This is a FACT.

It is as plain as the nose on your face, this [the current
"crisis"] is all about DESTROYING a CHRISTIAN NATION who will
not submit to the ONE WORLD BEAST. 
ISLAM has been used throughout the ages to attack CHRISTIANITY.
 
ISLAM is a tool in the hands of the CANAANITES. 

Many adherents of ISLAM are the foot soldiers for the
CANAANITES and dont even realize it.  Many Muslims would
have otherwise been Christians had it not been for the
infiltration of CANAANITES into Christianity who purposely
introduced the GROSS sort of HYPOCRISY we see in "ISRAEL"
today, via psuedo-christianity/Churchianity looking the
other way as the Arabs [true semites, many CHRISTIAN] are
mistreated and ethinically cleansed from their lands via
CANAANITE ISRAEL. [90% of KZAR-TURKO-FINNISH BLOOD, i.e.
NOT true semites, not israelites, not judahites, but
imposters as CHRIST Himself said REPEATEDLY in REVELATION
2:9, 3:9 and other places as well], but even the 
CANAANITE/KZARS can accept Christ, & we should all pray
they do, for they are the most decieved of all some would
assert.]

ISLAM is being used as a HORSE by the CANAANITES to destroy
Christianity wherever they can, robbing as many apathetic
AMERICAN/BRITISH/EUROPEAN "Christians" of their salvation as
possible.  ISLAM is just one of the CANAANITES several horses. 
CANAANITE-Masonic infiltrated England and its colony/lackey the
USA [no USA NEVER really gained independece if you are just now
realizing it] are simply being used by the CANAANITES to attempt
to destroy Christianity, of course they will fail, but we must
still be on the right side for as long as possible, because it
DOES matter where your heart is, we cannot FOOL God and switch
sides at the last minute all the while knowing the truth.  Here
is some great info from KOSOVO DOSSIER. The greatest victory
would be to bring even the CANAANITES to CHRIST VOLUNTARILY, of
their own free will choice, pray that this is happen, for ALL
can be children of GOD. 

http://www.beograd.com/kosovodossier

CHRISTIANITY AS A TARGET

A photograph which went around the world: Kosovo
Polje, the spring of 1981. A house for sale: the
separatists' objective - to make the Christian
population move out of Kosovo and Metohija

On 3 March 1990, about 2 p.m., in the village of Ve{ane near
Suva Reka, some 600 Albanians from the villages of Ve{ane,
Trnje and Topli~ane, on the call sent out by a megaphone
from a minaret of a mosque, gathered in front of the farm-yard
of the Serbian family of Jovan Jovanovi}. (There are around 200
Albanian and 50 Serbian houses in the village).
The Albanians assembled in front of the gate were
yelling, cursing and shouting insults, until the
police came from Suva Reka and dispersed them. The
next morning, about 1,000 Albanians gathered again
in front of the farmyard of the Jovanovi}s and it was
not till eleven o'clock that the police drove them
away. "In these two days, the lives of all of us were
shortened by ten years", said Jovan Jovanovi}, the
head of the household. There were other Serbs in the
village who were threatened by other Albanians in the
previous days. Gani Ga{I threatened Nikola Ili}, and
Sejdi Krueziu and Adni Ta{I maltreated Nikola
Jankovi} when he was driving his sick daughter to see
the doctor, together with his wife.

A frightening figure of more than 50,000 Serbs
expelled from Kosovo and Metohija only in the 1981
-
1990 period (and in the last 20 years the number
of expelled Serbs amounted to 400,000) is an irrefutable
argument that the point in question is genocide and
the exodus of the Serbian people. It is a frontal and
brutal attack of Albanians on the Slavic population
which aims to expel the remaining ones from Kosovo
and Metohija as well, and all that in the service of
Greater Albania which existed only as a fascist creation.

Prominent American commentator Charles Krauthammer
wrote lately in the Washington Post that there was
"a Muslim conspiracy from Kashmir to Kosovo", stating
that the targets of aggressive Muslim combatants
throughout the world were Hindus in Kashmir,
Armenians in Azerbaijan, Christians in Lebanon and
Serbs in Kosovo alike. "All they (Muslims) have their
own beginnings and each of them his own demands for
justice. Nevertheless, what is common to all of them
is not only the same political thread - a Muslim
request for hegemony, but also the geographic unity.
Look at the map: the Muslim countries occupy
territories from Morocco to Pakistan. All the
conflicts (against Christians) occur on their
boundaries, exactly along the lines separating the
Muslim world from non-Muslims who encircle it...
Kosovo is the farthest point of the penetration of
the Muslim population into Christian Europe...
Everything that has been going on before the eyes of
the world is a further evolution of the Islamic
awakening: the request for the local hegemony of the
Muslim population on the border of the Muslim
homeland. There is a lot of irony in that request.
While insisting on self-determination, these Muslim
activists are asking for the one thing the entire
Islamic world has been refusing to give to any ethnic
group: neither their Kurds, nor their Armenians nor
their Negroes (in the southern Sudan) are not allowed
to have the sovereignty and control over the 
territory where they constitute the local majority.
And they are asking for political control in Kashmir
and in Kosovo, where they are the local majority.
Will they (Muslims) permit minor groups within these
territories to have similar autonomy, let alone
independence? It is highly unlikely that Hindus in
Kashmir and Serbs from Kosovo would enjoy many civil
rights, not to mention national rights, under the
rule of Islamic separatists... In the Islamic world,
self-determination is permitted only to Muslims.
The matter that has been permanently pursued is a
pan-Islamic request for sovereignty on each territory
where they constitute the local majority... There is
a much broader and deeper movement for both political
independence and political supremacy of Muslims.
That movement is still far from being a democratic one.
Accordingly, as Serbs from Kosovo and Armenians from
Azerbaijan can testify, this movement continues to be
far from a tolerant one. Its power, which is now
shaking the borders of Islamic world, has just begun
to be felt."

Going in the opposite directions: since the competent
authorities of Kosovo did not do what they had
promised, the inhabitants of Batus and some other
villages around Pri{tina decided to collectively
leave their homes. The columns set off in the early
hours of 19 June 1986 followed by law-enforcement officers.

(Tanjug, "Vecernje novosti", 22 November 1990)

To OBTAIN EUSTACE MULLINS books write to him at:

EZRA PUND INSTITUTE of CIVILIZATION
P.O. BOX 1105
Staunton, Virginia 24401

or visit a web page of containing some of his writings at:
http://home.inreach.com/dov/cdlbook3.htm
and scroll down till you find his name.

>   --------------------------------------------------
> 
> Subject: A VIEW FROM THE INSIDE OF A BOMBING
> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 1999 01:43:17 -0700 (PDT)
> From: BoBox@webtv.net (Bo Tomlyn)
> 
> A VIEW FROM THE INSIDE OF A BOMBING
> 
> An Editorial from Yugoslavia
> 
> Background
> 
> Although I am an American citizen, born and raised in San Antonio,
> Texas, I have lived, studied and worked in Yugoslavia (Serbia) for
> almost thirteen years now. I initially came to help a friend build his
> house in a village near Novi Sad.
> 
> Subsequently I fell in love, got married and established my family here.
> I have been working at the College of Arts and Sciences at the
> University of Novi Sad as a language instructor for about nine years.
> In my time here, I have come to love the people of this nation, and I am
> very proud of my new home here. I have friends among many of the
> nationalities who live here in Vojvodina and have an enormous range of
> friends, from farmers to university professors. Life here has always
> been a challenge, dealing with the languages, with the economic crises,
> with the nearby wars. However, it has been overwhelmingly rewarding. My
> life was peaceful and full of love and companionship, until Wednesday,
> March 24, 1999. That evening, NATO bombs began to fall on my second
> homeland, and on the town I call home. How could anyone decide to stay
> here in the midst of NATO air strikes, among a people the western press
> claims is committing "ethnic cleansing"?  There are two reasons for my
> being here. My daughter Sara was born on at 2:30 a.m. on Monday, March
> 22, 1999 in the local hospital. My wife and daughter came home on the
> very day the bombing started. They are doing well, but they are
> obviously in no condition to travel.
> 
> Moreover, in a state of war, it is very hard to find a means of
> transportation which is adequate to their needs. The wisdom of sitting
> in a metal container with a heat signature at this time and place is
> also questionable. There are also the technical problems of registering
> my daughter when I dare not step out of the house. You cannot cross
> borders with an unregistered baby. On the other hand, I am not sure I
> would leave even if those conditions were met. My life, my apartment, my
> work, my family, many of my friends--they are all here. I am a loyal
> resident of this country.
> 
> I teach, I translate, I do whatever I can to make my community a better
> place to live in, just as I would if I were living somewhere in the USA.
> I have been met with open arms and embraced by the people of this land.
> Leaving them in this hour of need does not seem right. In the end of all
> things, my son Luka and my daughter are half-Serb  As the bombs and
> rockets rip the land each day, I find myself reflecting about why this
> is happening.
> 
> Knowing that I have freedom of expression in my homeland, I have decided
> to share my reflections. I find my thoughts following two lines of
> analysis. I would like to express them both in this editorial  First
> Line - Citizens of Serbia  From the standpoint of the people who live
> here, shock was generally the first feeling experienced when the attacks
> began. Now, we are all appalled at what is taking place. The long term
> friendship between Serbia and the USA was destroyed when the first bomb
> fell. It is true that the Serbs have a traditional friendship with the
> Russians, but that is not to overshadow their remarkable ties to the US
> throughout this century. The media have a way of sidelining that fact,
> but the history books bear it out. People here feel betrayed by a
> traditional ally -- the US.  Yet, the Serbs have a history of fighting
> against greater powers. The Ottomans, the Austro-Hungarians, and the
> Germans.
> 
> Now the Germans are being allowed to take part in a new campaign against
> the Serbs. The Hungarians have allowed NATO to use their airspace, as
> have the Croatians. The raids are being launched from NATO air bases in
> Italy. Seen in terms of the Second World War, none of that comes as a
> great surprise. It also comes as no surprise that, now that NATO has
> invaded a sovereign state for the first time in its fifty year history
> (the cynics here say it was only a matter of time), people here are not
> in a panic. They have faced the "big guy on the block" before, have
> taken some beatings, won some victories, and survived. They feel they
> will survive this as well.  In the past, the attackers were always
> neighbors. The current air strikes prove that the world has become
> indeed a Global Village, in the most pessimistic sense of that phrase.
> 
> President Clinton says that we have vital interests in the Balkans, and
> he is striking Yugoslavia as easily as if it were a next door neighbor.
> The difference this time is that there are relatively few (are there
> ever too few?) civilian casualties. The advanced technology of the NATO
> pact is allowing precision strikes on military and nonmilitary targets.
> (Blowing up an old soap factory and a defunct cable factory seem to be
> the questionable targets in Novi Sad itself). A famous Serb author,
> Svetislav Basara, has written that such advanced technology was not
> created for humane purposes. He claims that human casualties are to be
> avoided because a dead enemy is a dead consumer for the global market.
> You cannot sell fancy western products to corpses. While cynical, there
> is a ring of truth to this.
> 
> Thus, the Yugoslavs feel they are being attacked because they refused to
> sign an agreement that was being sold to them by America, one which
> would ensure a "global" way of life, but one which would put NATO forces
> on their sovereign territory. These forces would necessarily include
> American troops, by the way, no matter what the White House is currently
> claiming about its unwillingness to include ground forces in this
> particular package.
> 
> When one reads the document signed by the Kosovar Albanians in Paris,
> this becomes apparent. It contains Annex B which states that NATO would
> have the right to move freely throughout Yugoslavia. In earlier
> times,signing such a document would be called a "capitulation", and from
> a territorial stance "annexation".
> Opinions about what should be done with Kosovo were divided as long as I
> have lived here. Some said the Albanians were welcome here. Some said
> they should behave more like normal citizens. (There are some 100,000
> Albanians living in Belgrade. On Sunday, some of them staged a protest
> against the bombing. This was warmly greeted by the Serbs.) Some said
> that Kosovo should be partitioned off and given to Albania. Others
> claimed that Kosovo should be swept clean of Albanians and resettled by
> Serbs. There was no consensus. When that first Tomahawk crashed into
> Serbia on Wednesday night, all divisions ceased.
> 
> Kosovo will now be dealt with the way the government here feels it
> should with the whole-hearted backing of the general populace. NATO has
> rushed in where even fools do not dare. By declaring war on the Serbs,
> NATO has set the current humanitarian problem in motion. There were
> always problems in Kosovo, but the NATO strikes are clearly at fault for
> the fact that tens of thousands of people are on the road out of the
> country tonight. Whatever people here thought of Milosevic's regime
> before (and there are always varying opinions about politicians),they
> now back him as their commander-in-chief. Just as people would in any
> other country.
> 
> There is also a sense of frustration here about the fact that Russia,
> China, India, and Greece are being ignored so blatantly. The news
> broadcasts from the UK and US keep showing government and NATO leaders
> talking about how they have the support of the "International
> Community". Clearly, they have redefined the term "International
> Community". For NATO leaders that means anyone who agrees with them.
> Anyone who dissents is marginalized. One can presuppose that the tens of
> thousands of people protesting in the streets all over the world are
> also not a part of the International Community.
> 
> Turning a deaf ear to opposition is not one of the hallmarks of
> democracy, and is certainly incongruous with what we Americans consider
> to be the "American Way".  The stance of international justice also
> seems to have gotten muddled for those of us who reside here. In the
> first place, the Serbs have been hit by NATO twice before. Once in
> Croatia and once in Bosnia. This newest wave of bombing proves that NATO
> has something personal against the Serbs. No one can answer the logical
> question of why the Serbs are always the ones to be Satanized by NATO
> and the western media. An analogy will help to clarify the situation:
> when the Serbs attacked Vukovar and it was left in ruins, they were
> labeled "war criminals". On the other hand, pictures are now coming out
> of Prishtina (the capital of Kosovo). The NATO bombers have inflicted
> irreparable damage to the town, leaving it looking very much like
> Vukovar. How will the NATO leaders be labeled for that? The devil in me
> doubts that they will be labeled little other than "heroes".
> 
> The enormous spirit and tremendous sense of humor among the Yugoslavs is
> overwhelming. True, many are frightened, in hiding from the explosions
> which seem to come from nowhere. But overall, the spirit of these people
> is far from broken. They understand that NATO could have destroyed 600
> targets in two days, but that the demands of psychological warfare
> dictate that it be drawn out over a longer period. The unease of knowing
> when and where the bombs will come is supposed to generate feelings of
> uncertainty and discontent.
> 
> Such tactics are failing miserably here, and the majority of the people
> have decided to ignore that particular element of the game. Each day
> there are concerts in Belgrade's main square, people move about their
> lives and jobs with additional care, but life has very much gone on
> here, as if to spite what they see as the childish tactics of the war
> technicians in Brussels. One of the most startling things I have heard
> these days was the comment of a young friend of mine. "They can take my
> life," she said, "but they cannot take away my dignity." Her dignity is
> more important to her than her fear of cruise missiles. That gives cause
> for reflection.  Second line - A Citizen of the United States.
> 
> This is not about divided loyalties, a lack of patriotism, or
> schizophrenia. I have always loved my country, and I love it today. I
> still feel it is the greatest place on earth. As an ex-patriot, I am in
> a position to see many of the beauties of the United States from an
> objective distance, and thereby my love for my homeland is perhaps even
> stronger than for many of the people who live in it. Moreover, I am one
> of the representatives of that country for, though I am only a private
> citizen, my work brings me into contact with thousands of people. For
> many of them, I am the only American they have ever met, or will meet,
> and their impression of the United States often depends on their
> impression of me.  Though I am no political or legal expert (I am just a
> humble English teacher), the situation in which I find myself demands
> that I ask the question of what the justification for these air strikes
> can be. Article One of the NATO statute clearly states that the
> organization's members are not to use their military might against any
> sovereign state, unless that state attacks them. Yugoslavia has attacked
> no one. Yet, since Wednesday, NATO has been pounding a variety of
> targets all over Yugoslavia. Logically, an organization which violates
> its own founding principles must cease to exist as an organization, or
> it must reformulate its founding principles.
> Perhaps there was a secret meeting where NATO suddenly amended its
> statute so as to allow it to attack at will, to crush countries who have
> rejected their offers of membership, for example. Or, perhaps they
> should reconstitute themselves under a new name. NATO ceased to exist as
> a legal entity at 7:55 p.m. on March 24.  Second, in making the decision
> to bomb Yugoslavia without a specific resolution from the United
> Nations, NATO cast the UN aside as a totally marginal institution. The
> NATO members knew that if they put up a resolution in the Security
> Council to bomb Yugoslavia, the Russians and Chinese would veto. Their
> excuse for the air attacks is Yugoslavia's non-compliance (as they
> describe it) with earlier resolutions. This means that NATO will now
> have a free hand to attack any country which refuses to comply with a
> resolution. Tonight, on the sixth night of bombing, the UN has taken no
> firm action to reestablish its authority. The Russian representative to
> the UN has tried to pass several resolutions to stop the bombing, which
> are now all being vetoed by the US.
> Catch 22. The only conclusion I can draw as an average citizen is that
> the UN must either react to what is happening, or lose all credibility
> as a political factor in the world. That will destroy fifty odd years of
> hard work and enormous expense, and will certainly not make the world a
> better place.  Furthermore, as Americans we tend to think of the cost
> per value aspect of any exchange. The United States, with a population
> of about 250 million, the most powerful country to have ever existed,
> has already spent billions of dollars of the taxpayers' money blowing up
> military targets in Yugoslavia, a country with a population of about 8
> million. The taxpayers' money is also causing "collateral damage" to
> schools, hospitals, and private homes, right in the heart of Europe.
> 
> All of this is inconceivably illogical.   Are President Clinton and
> Madeleine Allbright telling us that our enormous economic and diplomatic
> power could not be used to convince an ally to remain an ally? That is
> clearly a fantasy. The problem rather seems to lie in the fact that,
> somewhere in the planning rooms, a program was drawn up to set the
> Balkans up in a manageable way.
> 
> With the Serbs being the largest ethnic group in the Balkans, it is
> clear that their country must be atomized, they must be disunited so
> that they are no longer a regional power in Europe. In Paris, the Serbs
> were presented with a fait accompli.  "Agree to NATO presence, or we are
> going to blow up your army and kill your citizens." If one looks at the
> events of the past decade, this idea is at least worth consideration. In
> terms of buying power, those tax dollars may have been better spent on
> an intensive study of the problem, a detailed analysis of the history
> and characters of the peoples involved, and a carefully planned
> negotiation process.
> 
> I do not believe that President Clinton has ever been to Kosovo. I do
> not believe he has ever seen the beauty of the 800 year-old monastery of
> Gracanica, which was also damaged by the air attacks. He never saw the
> mosques, the synagogues, the cathedrals and patriarchates. I have come
> to doubt he ever really sat down and talked with Albanians from Kosovo,
> or with Serbs from Kosovo, to find out what they really wanted. I am
> convinced that he could have come to Yugoslavia, sat down with the
> parties in the conflict, and convinced them there was a peaceful way
> out. I would contend that, as the highest representative of the most
> powerful nation on earth, he had a responsibility to do so, if one of
> the vital interests of the United States is to ensure peace in Europe
> and in the world as he claims. Rather, without a clear understanding of
> the mentality of the people who live here, after analyzing piles of
> statistics and military data instead of the moral and spiritual state of
> the people of Yugoslavia, he decided for violent action. He thus put the
> lives of American military personnel in grave danger, with very little
> or no authorization from the American people. In doing so, he violated
> the principles of the Presidency, the principles upon which the UN and
> NATO were founded, and ultimately he was unfaithful to the American
> people. I am not angry at him. I feel misled and betrayed by him and
> certain individuals in his administration. With such actions and
> policies, the present administration is making the world an unsafe, even
> dangerous, place for all citizens of the United States. That is clearly
> not in the interest of the average US citizen.
> 
> Let us be clear again: I am not trying to justify the Yugoslav
> authorities or any of their actions. That is their business, and their
> experts must work on presenting a clearer picture of their vision of
> their own country. BOTH sides should have sat down and worked on a
> proper solution, that is obvious. What I am saying is that the people of
> Yugoslavia, and especially the Serbs, are not genocidal monsters as they
> are being depicted by the Clinton administration and the western media.
> 
> Please heed the words of one who has lived and is still living among
> them, even when they are at war with my own country. These are a
> broad-minded and loving, if stubborn, people. They have criminals, and
> they have saints. They are an invaluable part of the vast cultural
> heritage of Europe, and they deserve respect, support and encouragement
> as they struggle to become a vital part of a thriving Europe. They do
> not deserve to be showered with the wrath of the Clinton administration
> and its dependence on its ephemeral military strength.
> 
> The Future
> The situation is infinitely complicated here, and it would require
> volumes to explain all the intricacies of the Gordian knot called the
> Balkans. It seems that President Clinton has made the same mistake as
> one of his political forebears, Alexander the Great. Unable to untie the
> knot, he simply took his sword and hacked it in two. And we know the
> ultimate fate of Alexander and his Empire, and of all empires which
> place might above right. Perhaps it is not too late, but a major
> turnabout is due.
> 
> To the sounds of air-raid sirens, tonight I will bathe my baby daughter
> and put her to sleep. I will continue to teach my five and a half
> year-old son to read and count. And I will teach both of my children to
> live by the principles upon which America, and all western civilization,
> was founded. I will do this because I believe the greatness of our
> culture is not in its material wealth or military power. It is in its
> commitment to principles, justice and morality.
> 
> Tonight, light a candle and whisper a prayer for us, will you? We will
> do the same for you.
> 
> Peace on earth, good will to men.
> 
> Randall A. Major
> 
> Novi Sad, Yugoslavia
> 
> Have a Wonderful & Prosperous Day!  :-)
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bo Tomlyn - (National Product Trainer)
> 
> Conf Calls:  Tues, Thur, Sun 6:30 pm PST
> (916) 689-8634   > Training at 7:30
> FOD (415) 273-6178   www.winm.com