From: NoIDFound@aol.com
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1998 22:08:32 EST
Subject: RE:  The Informer Dialog -- The MAJOR QUESTION

THE MAJOR QUESTION:  How does the King own everything he owed before the "war"
and yet in the Definitive Treaty he acknowledges sovereignty of the several
states? 

ANSWER:  No problem really.  The Treaty allowed the States to be self-
governing.  It did not GIVE them property.  In fact, the treaty SPECIFICALLY
said that everything belonging to the King BEFORE the misunderstanding STILL
belonged to the King.

It said that the States COULD NOT impair the obligations of contracts.  And it
required this language in the Constitution.  So the States previously had
contracts to pay tribute to the King.   Those contracts were still in effect.

And we owed the King (who was also at the time the KING OF FRANCE -- see the
treaty!) about $170 MILLION in 1789 dollars.  And those DEBTS were still in
effect after the Treaty.

What about YOUR property that you work so hard to get and maintain?  

Look at what you call your car title.  It isn't a title.  It is a Certificate
of Title.  The REAL Title is held by the state.  

The same is true for your home.  If you really OWNED it, the county couldn't
take it for failure to pay the King's rent, disguised as property taxes.  

IRS Liens?  They don't exist.  That's why what they really file is a Notice of
Lien.   They have the rule book and most people don't have a clue what the
real rules are.

Read and study the ENTIRE treaty.  We did not win a war.   The King and his
Nobility in America resolved a misunderstanding.  And the King kept
everything.   And this is still what is happening today.   

All of the CONTINUING OBLIGATIONS at the time of the Definitive Treaty are
spelled out in it.

I have been in the trials like the ones the Informer spoke about where
evidence doesn't matter, where truth is not allowed and where the case is
decided before it begins.  And believe me, in the Matthies case (Willful
Failure to File) we tried everything feasible -- they listened to nothing.
And at trial, they stopped Hank from putting on a defense.  The jury was out
for about long enough to elect the foreman.  So much for a year's worth of
research based on the mammoth efforts of dozens of tax researcers and 1500
pages of legal pleadings.

Oh, the King thought he could still control the important stuff through his
Esquires (attorneys).  A small monkey wrench got thrown in when the REAL 13th
Amendment was passed prohibiting titles of nobility, etc..  That one lead to
the 1812 "misunderstanding" in which the King had the Library of Congress
burned to eliminate the proof of passage of the 13th amendment -- even though
it was PUBLISHED as part of the Constitution in many Western states for
decades.  

The Informer is the real expert on these issues and will, I am sure, be glad
to defend any of his statements.  You can write to him at BigAl123@Juno.Com.


Terry


NOTE:  Please remember that you can probably not write me at this address
(many have tried and had the mail returned as invalid).  Instead, write to
LawfulGovt@Juno.Com.